The committee’s chairman reacted angrily after Alexander Nix claimed an investigation by the knowledge commissioner meant the controversy was sub judice.
Damian Collins mentioned: “We’ve taken recommendation and he isn’t charged with any legal offence and there are not any energetic authorized proceedings.
“There may be subsequently no authorized purpose why Mr Nix can’t seem. The committee is minded to concern a proper summons for him to seem on a named day within the very close to future.”
The refusal got here because the digital, tradition, media and sport committee’s inquiry into the scandal was advised that the misuse of voters’ private knowledge was “rife” throughout the Brexit marketing campaign.
A former Cambridge Analytica worker alleged that the group Go away.EU could have additionally used knowledge from the insurance coverage companies run by its funder Arron Banks, to focus on potential Brexit supporters.
It could even have damaged electoral regulation as a result of work was finished by Cambridge Analytica that was not paid for and since knowledge from UK residents appeared to have been processed overseas, Brittany Kaiser mentioned.
In written proof, Ms Kaiser, Cambridge Analytica’s former director of programme growth, mentioned: “I now suppose that there’s purpose to consider that misuse of information was rife amongst the companies and campaigns of Arron Banks.
“If the private knowledge of UK residents who simply wished to purchase automobile insurance coverage was utilized by GoSkippy and Eldon Insurance coverage for political functions, as could have been the case, folks clearly didn’t choose in for his or her knowledge for use on this approach by Go away.EU.
Brexit talks: Prime points dealing with UK on leaving EU
“I’ve comparable issues about whether or not Ukip members consented to the usage of their knowledge.”
Mr Nix was requested to make a second look earlier than the pretend information inquiry after telling it, in February, that Cambridge Analytica didn’t have or use Fb knowledge.
It was then revealed that the private info of at the least 87m folks was harvested from Fb by an organization with a deal to share it with the London-based communications agency.
Mr Collins demanded Mr Nix, who was suspended from his position as chief government, return to be quizzed on “a number of inconsistencies in your evidence to us”.
He warned that “giving false statements to a choose committee is a really critical matter” and urged Mr Nix to “clarify” his feedback.
The data commissioner mentioned: “We’ve written to Mr Nix to ask him to be interviewed by our investigators. Our investigation is taking a look at whether or not legal and civil offences have been dedicated beneath the Information Safety Act.”
In her proof, Ms Kaiser mentioned she believed the variety of folks whose knowledge was harvested from Fb was “a lot better” than the 87m acknowledged.
And he or she claimed Cambridge Analytica, which she left in 2012, had created a number of of its personal Fb quizzes designed to reap knowledge from people.
They included a “intercourse compass” quiz which might inform Fb customers what their “private preferences” have been and a “music persona” quiz.