Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiHundreds of female Alaska attorneys call on Murkowski, Sullivan to vote ‘no’ on Kavanaugh Kavanaugh in op-ed defends getting ‘emotional’ GOP senator may miss Kavanaugh vote for daughter’s wedding MORE (R-Alaska) mentioned Friday night that she opposed Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court docket nomination, changing into the one Republican senator to return out in opposition to President TrumpDonald John TrumpHeitkamp releases ad explaining Kavanaugh no vote Trump mocks Al Franken over resignation: He folded ‘like a wet rag’ O’Rourke not ‘interested’ in Obama endorsement MORE‘s nominee.
“I can be a no tomorrow,” Murkowski mentioned in a speech on the Senate ground after describing how she had come to lean in opposition to voting to substantiate Trump’s second nominee to the excessive court docket in a last vote on Saturday.
However Murkowski mentioned that within the last tally she would ask that her vote be recorded as “current,” saying she was doing it as a courtesy to Sen. Steve DainesSteven (Steve) David DainesGOP senator may miss Kavanaugh vote for daughter’s wedding How the Trump tax law passed: The final stretch Key conservation fund for parks set to expire MORE (R-Mont.), who’s slated to attend his daughter’s marriage ceremony again residence on Saturday.
“I do that as a result of a buddy, a colleague of ours is in Montana this night and … he will be strolling his daughter down the aisle and he will not be current to vote,” Murkowski mentioned. “I’ve prolonged this as a courtesy to my buddy. It won’t change the result of the vote.”
Murkowski, who voted in opposition to ending debate on Kavanaugh earlier within the day Friday, mentioned throughout her speech on the Senate ground that she “was leaning towards supporting Choose Kavanaugh in his nomination.”
“However we all know that in our function of recommendation and consent, it isn’t simply the document itself. There may be extra that’s connected to it,” she added, mentioning “issues of temperament” and “demeanor.”
Murkowski introduced her determination hours after it turned clear that Kavanaugh had sufficient votes to be confirmed.
Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsKavanaugh in op-ed defends getting ‘emotional’ GOP senator may miss Kavanaugh vote for daughter’s wedding Bitter partisan battle over Kavanaugh enters final chapter MORE (R-Maine) introduced throughout her personal speech on the Senate ground earlier Friday that she would again his nomination forward of a last vote set for Saturday afternoon.
Collins’s assist gave Republicans the required 50 votes to permit Vice President Pence to forged a tie-breaking vote if obligatory. Collins was quickly joined by Sen. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinKavanaugh in op-ed defends getting ‘emotional’ GOP senator may miss Kavanaugh vote for daughter’s wedding Bitter partisan battle over Kavanaugh enters final chapter MORE (D-W.Va.), who mentioned he would vote for Kavanaugh, giving him the assist of 51 senators.
Murkowski mentioned Friday night time that she agreed with a lot of Collins’s feedback defending Kavanaugh, saying she did not suppose he would vote to overturn Roe v. Wade or represented a menace to protections for folks with preexisting situations.
However she indicated that her confidence in his nomination was not excessive sufficient to deliver herself to voting for him, given controversy swirling round allegations of sexual assault leveled in opposition to the nominee.
The Alaska senator acknowledged that it appeared that Kavanaugh can be seated on the Supreme Court docket “with out my vote.”
Murkowski pointed to Kavanaugh’s combative testimony earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee final week, saying “that look of impropriety has develop into unavoidable.”
She known as the bitter nomination course of for Kavanaugh “horrible” and “gut-wrenching,” saying it had left “good folks … needlessly damage.”